Rule 37
Evaluation Of Work Performance
(1) The work performance evaluation form to be used for the evaluation of work performance of an
Armed Police shall be as prescribed in Schedule-3.
(2) The division of total marks of the evaluation of work performance of an Armed Police shall be as follows:
6 Inserted by the Fifth Amendment.
(a) Maximum marks to be given by the supervisor -Eighteen marks
(b) Maximum marks to be given by the Reviewer -Twelve marks
(c) Maximum marks to be given by the Review
Committee -Ten marks
(3) There shall be a Supervisor, Reviewer and Review Committee as prescribed in Schedule 4 to evaluate the work performance of an Armed Police.
(4) In giving marks for the evaluation of work performance, the same shall have to be given on the basis as mentioned in this Rule and work performance evaluation form.
(5) The evaluation of work performance of an Armed Police shall be made annually (from the first day of the month of Shrawan to the last day of the month of Ashadh).
(6) If the supervisor has given more than Ninety-Five or less than Seventy Five of marks for the evaluation of work performance, the reason thereof shall have to set out and if less than Seventy per cent of marks has been given, information thereof shall be given to the concerned Armed Police and if he or she makes any comments, the
evaluation shall have to be sent to the Review Committee along with the reaction given by the concerned person. If the Committee is unsatisfied with the evaluation done by the Supervisor or Reviewer or both of them,
it may send back the same setting out the reason thereof. In the case of such returning back, the concerned evaluator shall evaluate the same once again or if he or she thinks unnecessary to amend the evaluation made before, then he or she shall send the same setting out the reasonable reason.
(7) While calculating marks for the purpose of work performance evaluation, average calculation of the work performance evaluation form of the latest years that are required to become the potential candidate shall be made.
Provided that, the work performance evaluation for the period of study, training, suspension, dismissal or United Nation’s Service shall be made and marks shall be given in average of the marks obtained in the immediate year before such study, training, suspension, dismissal or United Nation’s Service.
(8) Other provisions relating to the evaluation of work performance shall be as prescribed by the Promotion Committee.
Armed Police shall be as prescribed in Schedule-3.
(2) The division of total marks of the evaluation of work performance of an Armed Police shall be as follows:
6 Inserted by the Fifth Amendment.
(a) Maximum marks to be given by the supervisor -Eighteen marks
(b) Maximum marks to be given by the Reviewer -Twelve marks
(c) Maximum marks to be given by the Review
Committee -Ten marks
(3) There shall be a Supervisor, Reviewer and Review Committee as prescribed in Schedule 4 to evaluate the work performance of an Armed Police.
(4) In giving marks for the evaluation of work performance, the same shall have to be given on the basis as mentioned in this Rule and work performance evaluation form.
(5) The evaluation of work performance of an Armed Police shall be made annually (from the first day of the month of Shrawan to the last day of the month of Ashadh).
(6) If the supervisor has given more than Ninety-Five or less than Seventy Five of marks for the evaluation of work performance, the reason thereof shall have to set out and if less than Seventy per cent of marks has been given, information thereof shall be given to the concerned Armed Police and if he or she makes any comments, the
evaluation shall have to be sent to the Review Committee along with the reaction given by the concerned person. If the Committee is unsatisfied with the evaluation done by the Supervisor or Reviewer or both of them,
it may send back the same setting out the reason thereof. In the case of such returning back, the concerned evaluator shall evaluate the same once again or if he or she thinks unnecessary to amend the evaluation made before, then he or she shall send the same setting out the reasonable reason.
(7) While calculating marks for the purpose of work performance evaluation, average calculation of the work performance evaluation form of the latest years that are required to become the potential candidate shall be made.
Provided that, the work performance evaluation for the period of study, training, suspension, dismissal or United Nation’s Service shall be made and marks shall be given in average of the marks obtained in the immediate year before such study, training, suspension, dismissal or United Nation’s Service.
(8) Other provisions relating to the evaluation of work performance shall be as prescribed by the Promotion Committee.